Siskiyou County Farm Bureau
809 Fourth St
Yreka, CA 96097
ph: 530-842-2364
fax: 530-842-2364
siskfarm
11/15/11
.Permission for use is granted, however, credit must be made to the California Farm Bureau Federation when reprinting this item.
Farmers and ranchers charged for water rights have been sent their annual bills, which reflect increases that include a jump for the minimum charge for the first 10 acre-feet of water, from $100 up to $150.
The State Board of Equalization mailed payment notices Nov. 2 to water rights holders for fiscal year 2011-12. They went to some 6,500 water-right licensees and permitees, who hold more than 13,000 permits and licenses issued by a unit of the State Water Resources Control Board.
Starting when the charge was introduced in 2003, California Farm Bureau Federation attorneys have recommended that bill recipients also file a protest—technically, a petition for reconsideration—to the state water board. Doing so, they said, could improve chances of obtaining a refund if the fee were ultimately ruled invalid.
As in the past, CFBF Associate Counsel Carl Borden advises water rights holders to heed the Dec. 2 payment deadline and pay the charge, along with filing a protest.
"Paying the charge to the Board of Equalization will not only avoid the imposition of a penalty and interest, but it will protect the payer's water right from possible forfeiture," Borden said. "But in addition, the payer should file a petition for reconsideration, which the State Water Resources Control Board must receive by the Dec. 2 filing deadline."
Borden said a form that can be used to file a protest with the SWRCB is posted online atwww.cfbf.com/protestform.cfm.
Earlier this year, the state Supreme Court directed the court of appeal to return to the trial court the case brought by CFBF, to make detailed findings on whether the water rights fees assessed on holders of water rights permits and licenses are reasonably related to the benefits they receive from its regulatory activity and the burdens they impose on its regulatory program.
Doing so will allow the trial court to determine whether the fees were reasonably proportional and thus not a tax, the justices wrote in the decision the Supreme Court handed down in February.
(Kate Campbell is an assistant editor of Ag Alert. She may be contacted at kcampbell@cfbf.com.)
8/17/11
.California’s Above Ground Petroleum Storage Act (APSA) – Conditional Exemption
Farm’s, nurseries, logging and construction sites are conditionally exempt from the APSA to prepare and implement an SPCC plan which regulates storage of petroleum based oil products, including biodiesel. Propane, liquefied petroleum gas or liquefied natural gas are not regulated under APSA.
A tank facility located on a farm, logging or construction site is exempt if:
To maintain the conditional exemption from preparing and implementing an SPCC plan on farms, nurseries, logging and construction sites owners/operators are required to:
|
PA – Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan
The federal SPCC program is to prevent *oil spills into waters of the United States and adjoining shorelines. Farms, nurseries, logging and construction sites are not exempt under the federal SPCC regulations and are required to develop, certify and implement an SPCC Plan if:
§The farm stores more than 1,320 gallonsin aboveground containers of 55 gallons or greater or more than 42,000 gallonsin completely buried containers (Adjacent or non-adjacent parcels, either leased or owned, may be considered separate facilities for SPCC purposes do not need to be added together in determining whether the 1,320-gallon applicability threshold is met); and
|
What should you do?
1.Develop your SPCC plan:
§If your farm was in operation before August 16, 2002 and you do not already have an SPCC Plan in place, you must prepare a plan now. Don’t wait. If you have an SPCC plan in place you must maintain or amend your existing plan by November 10, 20110 and keep a copy on site.
2.Certify your SPCC plan:
§You may self-certify your SPCC Plan if your farm has a total oil storage capacity between 1,320 and 10,000 gallons in aboveground containers and there are no aboveground containers at your farm greater than 5,000 gallons in capacity. Your plan will need to contain the following information:
a.A list of the oil containers at the farm by parcel (including the contents and location of each container);
b.A brief description of the procedures that you will use to prevent oil spills. For example, steps you use to transfer fuel from a storage tank to your farm vehicles that reduce the possibility of a fuel spill;
c.A brief description of the measures you installed to prevent oil from reaching water (see next section);
d.A brief description of the measures you will use to contain and cleanup an oil spill to water; and
e.A list of emergency contacts and first responders.
§Or you may use the SPCC Plan template that is available to download from EPA’s Web site at: http://www.epa.gov/oem/content/spcc/tier1temp.htm
§You may need to have a certified Professional Engineer prepare your SPCC plan if:
Your farm has storage capacity of more than 10,000 gallons or has had an oil.
|
3.Implement your Plan:
For comprehensive information regarding the SPCC requirements, secondary containment, Tier I self-certification template, and information for Farmers fact sheet go to: http://www.epa.gov/oem/content/spcc/index.htm
Contact the California Farm Bureau: 916-446-4647.
| Read to the Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors during the meeting on Aug. 25, 2009 by President Jim Morris California Farm Bureau Policies: Natural Resources No: 99 (2008) Environmental Policy and Procedure We support the wise use of our resources. Agriculture must use all practical means to maintain the healthy environment on which it depends. Environmental regulations must be based on peer-reviewed, scientific evidence. Agriculture should not bear a disproportionate burden of meeting environmental regulations. We are concerned by the erosion of individual rights in environmental litigation and in particular with the lack of a requirment that intent be proven by the accuser. These protections are grounded in the United States and Clifornia constitutions and are fundamental to the American system of justice. The rules of evidence, burdens of proof, and other procedural safeguards for the rights of the accused that apply in criminal prosecutions and civil suits related to violations of other laws must be applied with equal force in litigation alleging violation of environmental laws. Federal and state environmental regulatory agencies should be required to study all impacts of any regulation they propose which will affect government, industry or agriculture, before such regulation is adopted. Those affected by any regulation imposed should have the right of a hearing and appeal. Local government entities with enforcement responsibilities should have authority to apply reasonable tolerances in consideration of local conditions. |
There are many other issues we are working hard on. We are always working to protect the farmer and ranchers rights.
Farm Bureau had a successful legislative session with numerous tallies in the win column.
In total there were 9 Farm Bureau supported bills signed and 10 Farm Bureau opposed bills vetoed.
Important Siskiyou County issues:
FARM BUREAU SUES FISHERY AGENCY OVER WATER RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT:
California Farm Bureau Federation filed a lawsuit that charges the state Department of Fish and Game with exceeding its authority by threatening to restrict farmers’ rights to irrigate their crops.
Siskiyou County Farm Bureau has been very active in fighting against local issues such as the Department of Fish and Game ITP permit, AB 32 , the KBRA, the Siskiyou National Monument and many more.
Below is a summary of the Governor’s vetoes and bill signings.
The Governor Signed the Following Farm Bureau Supported or Sponsored Legislation:
Accidental Take - SB 1303 Extends the Endangered Species Act accidental take provisions of the law that protects farmers and ranchers.
. Incidental Take - SB 1349 Allows for incidental take of experimental populations of salmon introduced under the San Joaquin River Restoration Program. Position: Support.
California Water Commission - AB 1260 Provides for a modification of commission member terms for the California Water Commission. Position: Support.
Water Bond - AB 1265 Delays the vote on the Water Bond proposal approved by the Legislature during the special session earlier in the year until November of 2012. Position: Support. .
Egg Standards AB 1437 Provides that all eggs sold in California be produced via Prop. 2 standards to level the playing field for California producers. Position: Support.
Timber Harvest Plans AB 2163 Allows two additional extensions for timber harvest plans from 2 one-year extensions to 4 one-year extensions. Position: Support.
Market Enforcement AB 2240Provides additional funding for the CDFA Market Enforcement Program which helps producers secure crop sales payments from buyers. Position: Sponsored.
Williamson Act AB 2530 Provides an alternative for counties that are considering exiting the Williamson Act through the mass nonrenewal of their landowner contracts. Position: Sponsored.
Organic Farming Registration AB 2612 Enables streamlining of organic farm registration process. Position: Sponsored.
The Governor Vetoed the Following Bills that Farm Bureau Opposed:
Overtime for Farm Workers SB 1121 Would have established an eight hour work day and forty hour work week for farm workers with premium pay to paid to farm employees working in excess of those hours.
Pesticide Mil Assessment SB 1157Would have increased in Pesticide Mil Assessment to fund integrated pest management programs at schools. .
Air Law Penalties SB 1433Would have automatically tied penalties for air law violations to the Consumer Price Index. .
Card Check SB 1474 Would have allowed the Agricultural Labor Relations Board to set aside an election and designate a union for farm workers in cases of employer misconduct that changed the outcome of an election.
Climate Change Community Benefits Fund AB 1405 Would have created a California Climate Change Community Benefits fund by requiring a minimum of 10% of revenues generated from sources under AB 32 to be deposited into the fund for use in disadvantaged communities.
Minimum Wage Violations AB 1881 (Would have doubled liquidated damages for minimum wage violations. .
Wage Payment AB 2187Would have created a new crime and new penalties for untimely payment of wages including jail time when an employee quits or is discharged.
Groundwater Mapping AB 2304Would have allowed groundwater mapping without notification of property owners.
The Governor Vetoed The Following Bill That Farm Bureau Supported
Career Technical Education AB 2446 Would have placed CTE courses within the state high school curriculum in lieu of a single course in either foreign language or the arts to meet graduation requirements. Position: Support.
The Governor Signed The Following Bill That Farm Bureau Opposed:
Department of Fish and Game Strategic Planning AB 2376 Relating to Department of Fish and Game strategic planning. Farm Bureau opposed because it could drive the department to raise fees to cover more of its costs. Position: Oppose.
The Governor also signed into law two new commissions
California Apiary Research Commission AB 1912 Will enable the establishment of a California Apiary Research Commission, subject to approval through a referendum by the producer group. Position: None.
California Nursery Producers Commission AB 2695 Authorizes the industry to form a California Nursery Producers Commission. subject to approval through a referendum by the producer group. Position: None.
Siskiyou County Farm Bureau
809 Fourth St
Yreka, CA 96097
ph: 530-842-2364
fax: 530-842-2364
siskfarm